Local Government Legal

Local Government Legal prepares a regular email newsletter with legal updates on relevant court judgements and a summary and analysis of legislative changes.

Local Government Amendment (Councillor Misconduct and Poor Performance) Act 2015

The Local Government Amendment (Councillor Misconduct and Poor Performance) Act 2015 (Amending Act) commenced on 13 November 2015 and makes several changes to the Local Government Act 1993 (LG Act) dealing with councillor misconduct and poor performance and council maladministration.

Disqualification from holding civic office

The Amending Act inserted section 275(1A) to the LG Act which provides that a person shall be disqualified from holding civic officer for 5 years if the person is the subject of three or more orders for suspension from civic office for misconduct. One of the three orders must have been made after commencement of the new section by the Departmental Chief Executive or the Civil and Administrative Tribunal on a referral from the Departmental Chief Executive.

Response time to investigation report

When a council is subject to an investigation, a council now has 28 days (previously 40 days) to respond to the Minister giving notice of the things done or proposed to be done to give effect to any recommendations contained in the report.

Wider definition of “misconduct”

The definition of misconduct under s440F(1) now includes:

(e) an act or omission of the councillor intended by the councillor to prevent the proper or effective functioning of the council or a committee of the Council.”

Examples of such conduct may include:

  • preventing a council from making a decision by deliberately leaving a meeting to deprive it of a quorum;
  • submitting large numbers of notices or questions on notice with a view to preventing the council from getting through its business, and
  • misusing rescission motions to prevent councils from revisiting a matter for another three months.

The amendments would enable appropriate disciplinary action to be taken against a councillor in these circumstances.

Disclosure

A councillor is no longer required to disclose the nature of a pecuniary interest (s451(1)) or remove themselves from the meeting of the council or committee (s451(2)) where the pecuniary interest arises only because of an interest of the councillor in the councillor’s principle place of residence or an interest of another person (whose interests are relevant under s443) in that person’s principle place of residence, where the councillor has made a special disclosure in relation to the interest before the commencement of the meeting (s451(4)(a1)). As a result, councillors with property interests, other than their principle place of residence, within a local government area will be precluded from participating in the consideration of planning changes which relate to these areas.

This is a significant change which has been introduced by the Minister in order to prevent councillors from participating in the consideration of changes to a planning instrument affecting an area in which they have a pecuniary interest.

Performance improvement orders

The amending Act has introduced a number of changes to performance improvement orders including:

  • Ability for the Minister to vary an existing performance improvement order by giving 7 days’ notice.
  • Reducing consultation periods so that councils now only have 7 days to respond to a notice of intention to issue a performance improvement order.
  • Introduction of s438A(7A) so that it is no longer a requirement for the expiration of performance improvement order to remedy non-compliance.

Enforcement of performance improvement order against a councillor

Further, section 438HA has been inserted and allows the Chief Executive to arrange for a departmental report to be prepared detailing whether a councillor has failed to take action as required by a performance improvement order. Such a report must be prepared when requested by the Minister. Where a departmental report finds that a councillor has failed to take necessary action under a performance improvement order the Minister may issue a compliance order to the councillor. Such an order may remain in force for a period not exceeding 3 months or where extended in writing by the Minister for a period not extending 6 months.

Where a compliance order is in force the councillor is not entitled to:

(a) exercise any of the functions of the councillor other than is necessary to take the action specified in the compliance order, and

(b) any fee or other remuneration, or to the payment of expenses or to the use of council facilities, to which he or she would otherwise be entitled as a councillor, except as specified in the compliance order.

The Minister may request the Chief Executive to refer the matter to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal for consideration. Failure by a councillor to take action as required by a performance improvement order is to be taken to be misconduct.

Serious corrupt conduct

As a result of the amendments (s440B(1A)) the Governor may disqualify a person from holding civic office for a period not exceeding 5 years where;

  • a recommendation has been made by the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) that consideration be given to the suspension of the person from office with a view to his or her dismissal for serious conduct,
  • the person has since ceased to hold civic office, and
  • the Minister advised that the disqualification of the person from holding civic office is necessary in order to protect the public standing of councils and the proper exercise of their functions.

Amendments have also been made to s440C and s440D with regard to temporary suspension as a result of serious corrupt conduct.

Preparation of departmental report – without investigation

Another key amendment introduced is the ability for the Chief Executive to arrange for a departmental report to be prepared about whether a councillor has engaged in misconduct without an investigation being carried out (s440H(5A)). An investigation is no longer required where:

(a) the matter has been referred by the council and the Chief Executive is of the opinion that the report may be based on the findings of an investigation conducted by or on behalf of the council, or

(b) the Chief Executive is of the opinion that the alleged misconduct, if proven, would be minor in nature and, were it to warrant disciplinary action, the disciplinary action would be compromised only of counselling or reprimanding the councillor, or

(c) the Chief Executive otherwise considers it appropriate to do so.

Notice of disciplinary action

Prior to undertaking disciplinary action for misconduct against a councillor the Chief Executive is required to give written notice under s 440I(3A) of:

(a) of the grounds on which it is proposed to take disciplinary action,

(b) specifying the disciplinary action that is proposed to be taken, and

(c) inviting the councillor to make a submission within a period of not less than 14 days.

For further information, please contact Tony Pickup of Local Government Legal on (02) 4922 2307

* The above information is not to be relied upon as legal advice.

Subscribe By Email

Receive an email each time we release a publication.